MSLF Notches a Win By Moving Grizzly Cases To Wyoming

Mountain States Legal Foundation celebrated a victory Monday, when a pair of consolidated grizzly bear-related cases that plaintiffs wanted heard by a federal court in distant Washington, D.C., were transferred to Wyoming’s Federal District Court for resolution. That’s where the cases rightfully belonged, argued MSLF, which supported the venue change because it believes such cases should be heard closest to where the impacts of any final rulings will be felt.

“The DC Court recognized with this ruling the matters of great local importance, like local grazing issues, should be decided locally and that the courts of DC do not have any special advantage in deciding such cases, said MSLF General Counsel Zhonette M. Brown. “The DC Court also rejected the environmentalists’ invitation to turn this into a ‘national’ more than ‘local’ matter just because federal statutes are involved.”

The consolidated cases involved are Center for Biological Diversity v. David L. Bernhardt and Western Watersheds Project v. David L. Bernhardt.

U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta was convinced by the Wyoming ranchers MSLF represents that the Cowboy State was a better venue for the case because most of the research and government actions related to the litigation occurred there.

“In administrative law cases, like this one, courts focus on where the decision-making process occurred to determine where the claim arose,” noted the Judge. “As noted, the challenged agency decision-making here all occurred in Wyoming.” The court found that “the local interest” in “having local controversies decided at home,” along with the fact that Wyoming has a direct stake in the outcome, weighed heavily in favor of a venue change.

The court gently chided the plaintiffs for attempting to “nationalize” the controversy by bringing the cases to DC. “But as Defendants correctly point out, the mere fact that a case involves a protected species does not transform a local controversy into one of national significance.” Though it involves a threatened species, “this case is decidedly a more local controversy than a national one,” wrote Judge Mehta. 

The merits of the case will be heard once the new judge sets a schedule.

Explore this case

Center for Biological Diversity v. Bernhardt

View Case
Explore More

Listen: MSLF talks grizzly bears with Wake Up Wyoming

Environmentalists’ efforts to keep grizzly bears protected by the Endangered Species Act puts Wyoming ranchers in harm’s way. MSLF attorney Cody Wisniewski discussed the problem and the case with Glenn Woods on Wake Up Wyoming.

Wyoming Ranchers and Farmers Now Endangered, Not the Grizzlies

Keeping a family farm, sheep or cattle ranch profitable is a difficult enough without special interest groups making it harder. The grizzly bear was once an endangered species, but in 2017 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service found the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s grizzly population exceeded scientists’ minimum goals for the powerful predator. It had fully recovered. The agency tried to remove the animal from the endangered list, but was sued in Crow Indian Tribe v. United States of America. More recently, environmental groups also got involved trying to prevent delisting of the grizzly.

Hunting Guide’s Killing Raises Stakes in Grizzly Case

U.S. District Court Judge Dana Christensen issued a decision in late September invalidating the delisting of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear and returning the bear to the endangered species list—contrary to the recommendation of 20 years of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service research, and the pleas of Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and Mountain States Legal Foundation’s clients.

Join the Fight

Since 1977, MSLF has fought to protect private property rights, individual liberties, and economic freedom. MSLF is a nonprofit public interest legal foundation. We represent clients pro bono and receive no government funding. Make your 100% tax deductible contribution today and join the fight.

Donate Now

News Updates