MSLF Notches a Win By Moving Grizzly Cases To Wyoming

Mountain States Legal Foundation celebrated a victory Monday, when a pair of consolidated grizzly bear-related cases that plaintiffs wanted heard by a federal court in distant Washington, D.C., were transferred to Wyoming’s Federal District Court for resolution. That’s where the cases rightfully belonged, argued MSLF, which supported the venue change because it believes such cases should be heard closest to where the impacts of any final rulings will be felt.

“The DC Court recognized with this ruling the matters of great local importance, like local grazing issues, should be decided locally and that the courts of DC do not have any special advantage in deciding such cases, said MSLF General Counsel Zhonette M. Brown. “The DC Court also rejected the environmentalists’ invitation to turn this into a ‘national’ more than ‘local’ matter just because federal statutes are involved.”

The consolidated cases involved are Center for Biological Diversity v. David L. Bernhardt and Western Watersheds Project v. David L. Bernhardt.

U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta was convinced by the Wyoming ranchers MSLF represents that the Cowboy State was a better venue for the case because most of the research and government actions related to the litigation occurred there.

“In administrative law cases, like this one, courts focus on where the decision-making process occurred to determine where the claim arose,” noted the Judge. “As noted, the challenged agency decision-making here all occurred in Wyoming.” The court found that “the local interest” in “having local controversies decided at home,” along with the fact that Wyoming has a direct stake in the outcome, weighed heavily in favor of a venue change.

The court gently chided the plaintiffs for attempting to “nationalize” the controversy by bringing the cases to DC. “But as Defendants correctly point out, the mere fact that a case involves a protected species does not transform a local controversy into one of national significance.” Though it involves a threatened species, “this case is decidedly a more local controversy than a national one,” wrote Judge Mehta. 

The merits of the case will be heard once the new judge sets a schedule.

Explore this case

Center for Biological Diversity v. Bernhardt

View Case
Explore More

MSLF Throws Penalty Flag on Latest Grizzly Recovery “Games”

Denver, CO — September 22, 2020 — Mountain States Legal Foundation last week threw a penalty flag on environmental groups for their continued attacks on the federal government’s successful grizzly bear recovery program; in this case, they are asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana to give non-binding federal “guidance documents” the same force of law as official regulatory edicts.   MSLF, on behalf of its clients Wyoming Stock Growers Association,…

Listen: MSLF talks grizzly bears with Wake Up Wyoming

Environmentalists’ efforts to keep grizzly bears protected by the Endangered Species Act puts Wyoming ranchers in harm’s way. MSLF attorney Cody Wisniewski discussed the problem and the case with Glenn Woods on Wake Up Wyoming.

New Case Alert: Grizzly Fight Becomes Environmentalist Power Grab

Scientists say the Yellowstone Area Grizzly has recovered and should no longer be listed on the Endangered Species List. It was a conservation success. Instead of rejoicing, big-city environmentalists sued to keep the bear on the endangered list. Now, in a new lawsuit, the radical groups are using the grizzly again to advance their anti-ranching agenda.

Join the Fight

Since 1977, MSLF has fought to protect private property rights, individual liberties, and economic freedom. MSLF is a nonprofit public interest legal foundation. We represent clients pro bono and receive no government funding. Make your 100% tax deductible contribution today and join the fight.

Donate Now

News Updates