Once upon a time, there was a precocious young man named Jaiden who lived near the mountains. He enjoyed reading books like The Tuttle Twins, was an exceptional student and member of his school community, and even put his hat in the ring to serve as Vice President of his 7th grade class.
He also loved his country and was proud of the pastimes of his land. Of all the traditions of his people, there were three Jaiden cherished most:
Sport shooting, limited government, and speaking his mind.
He loved these things so much that he decided to combine them. Jaiden has long used his backpack as a kind of movable billboard to display his views on the issues of the day. He does this mostly through a collection of Velcro patches, some political and some just for fun.
Jaiden’s favorite patches include the famous “DONT TREAD ON ME” flag, aka the “Gadsden Flag,” a symbol of resistance to government overreach. He wears it as a tribute to those who fought for our rights in the American Revolution. In case you don’t know, it looks like this:
Among Jaiden’s other favorites are images of Pac-Man style ghosts carrying 3-D printed “ghost guns”—a clever little bit of humor for a 7th grader. He laughed when he first saw them and was excited to add them to his collection. Here is what they look like:
Jaiden has been wearing patches like these to school for years. No one ever complained. No one ever felt threatened or offended . . . until this year, when something changed at Jaiden’s school. Nobody knows for sure (the school has not said), but it could be that a new crop of “social justice” oriented teachers came on board who find Jaiden’s pro-liberty views disagreeable. Whatever the reason, this year, Jaiden’s school suddenly decided that his patches and ideas were too dangerous to be around other kids.
While other kids were getting settled into the new school year, learning their schedules, and meeting new friends, Jaiden was spending time in the principal’s office being repeatedly interrogated about his patches. During meetings among school officials, Jaiden, and his mother Eden, he was told he had to remove his patches—especially the Gadsden flag patch and those that referred to firearms. They forbade him from ever displaying the patches at school again. Jaiden was shocked—but not deterred.
Case Background
The story of Jaiden Rodriguez gained national attention at the beginning of the school year in 2023. Jaiden lives in Colorado Springs, Colorado, where he attends Vanguard School in the Harrison School District 2. What he experienced from school administrators and district officials is one of the more egregious acts of student censorship in recent memory.
More than 50 years ago, the US Supreme Court in Tinker v. Des Moines ruled that students “do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” This has been the bedrock of First Amendment protections for all students in this country for the last half-century.
Under the Constitution, schools may limit student speech only under narrowly defined circumstances. Specifically, schools may restrict the way a student speaks so as not to cause substantial disruption to the school day or undermine other students’ ability to learn. Beyond that, students are free to speak their mind, or not speak at all.
Vague, Broad, Misinformed
Unfortunately, too many education bureaucrats have exploited the idea that “disruptions” may be caused by speech that they simply don’t like. School policies often employ vague and overly broad terms like “bullying” or “safe learning environment” to empower staff to silence any student at whim, especially students who have tradition, pro-liberty, or conservative views.
A peaceful, silent display of a patch representing a key symbol of American independence, or a patch mocking gun control, does not constitute a substantial disruption or undermine the educational experience. If anything, they are critical opportunities to explore history and foster classroom discussions on prominent issues facing society.
One school official laughably claimed the Gadsden flag would be too dangerous to have around other kids because of its alleged “roots in slavery.” She was dead wrong—the flag is not “pro-slavery,” but it is a warning against would-be tyrants to not violate the rights of citizens. The irony is astounding.
Too Broad for the Constitution
As for the ghost patches and other patches related to the right to keep and bear arms, the school applied a blanket policy forbidding any clothing or accessories that “refer to…weapons.” This goes far beyond sensible policies prohibiting students from bringing weapons or simulated weapons to school.
Harrison School District 2 broadly attempts to stamp out not only mere images of weapons, but anything that might be related to weapons. Theoretically, the very word “sword,” “cannon,” or “lance” on a notebook could be grounds for official disciplinary action. The policy is so broad that it would forbid a student from displaying the official seal of the State of Colorado because it contains a battle axe and shield, or a one-dollar bill because it depicts an eagle clutching a bundle of arrows. Such a policy is far too broad to be considered acceptable under the Constitution.
Join the Fight
Since 1977, MSLF has fought to protect private property rights, individual liberties, and economic freedom. MSLF is a nonprofit public interest legal foundation. We represent clients pro bono and receive no government funding. Make your 100% tax deductible contribution today and join the fight.
What’s at Stake
The school says that the ban on Jaiden’s display of the Gadsden flag patch has been temporarily lifted. However, education bureaucrats have threatened to ban it again as soon as anyone, including school officials, “complains,” which is virtually certain to happen as soon as this matter fades from the headlines. On top of the humiliating lecture Jaiden endured when he was first told not to wear the patch, this warning that the district may re-enforce the policy is nothing short of a threat to curtail his speech once more. And, despite backtracking (temporarily) on the Gadsden Flag ban under the hot glare of public attention, the school has never lifted its ban on Jaiden’s display of his pro-gun-rights patches.
With Mountain States Legal Foundation representing him in court, Jaiden is seeking an injunction barring the school district from continuing its unconstitutional censorship.
Referring to weapons or American history is not a substantial disruption to the learning environment. The only people who are impeding the ability of other students to learn are education bureaucrats who fail to understand the First Amendment.
For Americans everywhere, Jaiden’s case is vitally important. Government agencies, such as public-school districts, are increasingly being captured by actors with a particular political agenda. While everyone is free to his or her own opinion, government actors cannot ram through their own views by suppressing speech with which they disagree, or that makes them feel uncomfortable. Public schools are the front line in the battle to preserve a culture and practice of free speech and open debate. Jaiden’s case will set an important precedent to hold schools accountable for their duty to honor the First Amendment.
Case Timeline
- August 2023:
- Jaiden was told to remove his patches, including the Gadsden Flag patch
- Jaiden’s mother shared a video of the meeting with school officials, and it went viral
- Jaiden’s story went national, after which even Colorado Governor Jared Polis tweeted on social media the school was in the wrong
- Facing pressure, the school removed the ban, but maintained it can implement it again whenever it likes
- October 2023: Mountain States Legal Foundation filed a federal lawsuit seeking to vindicate Jaiden’s right to freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. The lawsuit seeks an injunction ordering the school to stop censoring Jaiden’s speech, as well as damages and a declaration of Jaiden’s rights.
- April 2025: A federal judge denied the government’s motion to dismiss—Jaiden’s case is moving forward!
