Case Summary

Issue:

Whether Congress may condition the receipt of federal funding upon the willingness of colleges and universities to permit military recruiters upon their campuses?

Plaintiff:

Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (FAIR)–an association of 24 law schools and law faculties opposed to military recruiters on college campuses–and its allies

Defendant:

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and five other Cabinet Officers, sued in their official capacities

Amicus Curiae:

Congressman Richard Pombo, three law students, and Mountain States Legal Foundation

Join the Fight

Since 1977, MSLF has fought to protect private property rights, individual liberties, and economic freedom. MSLF is a nonprofit public interest legal foundation. We represent clients pro bono and receive no government funding. Make your 100% tax deductible contribution today and join the fight.

Donate Now

Status

Court

U.S. Supreme Court (No. 04-1152)

Case History

The Solomon Amendment bars universities and colleges from receiving federal funding if they do not permit military representatives access for recruiting purposes. Various law schools and law school professors oppose the presence of military recruiters at their schools because of the schools’ policy of non-discrimination and the military’s policy regarding homosexual activity.

On September 19, 2003, FAIR sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that the Solomon Amendment violates the First Amendment rights of the schools and professors. On November 5, 2003, the District Court denied FAIR’s motion for an injunction; FAIR appealed. On November 29, 2004, the Third Circuit ruled 2-1 that the Solomon Amendment violates the First Amendment rights of the law schools and their professors.

On February 28, 2005, the United States filed its petition for writ of certiorari. On March 30, 2005, MSLF filed its amici curiae brief on behalf of Congressman Pombo, the law students, and MSLF, and FAIR filed its opposition. On May 2, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. On July 18, 2005, the United States filed its brief on the merits, and MSLF filed an amici curiae brief on behalf of Congressman Pombo, three law students, and MSLF. Oral arguments were held on December 6, 2005.

Explore More

SCOTUS WATCH: New Decision ALERT!

Today the Supreme Court of the United States issues an opinion in Students for Fair Admission, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College. MSLF’s General Counsel Will Trachman and…

Check-The-Box “Diversity” is At Odds with a Merit-Based Society

When did merit cease to serve as the primary basis for political or professional advancement in this supposedly colorblind, “gender-neutral,” equality-oriented society?  I of course recognize “diversity” (however one defines it) as a worthy goal, broadly speaking. But it amazes and troubles me…

Get the latest updates from MSLF
News Updates