Case Summary

Farmers and ranchers lease federally managed land to raise their flocks and herds, and ultimately to feed millions of Americans. They pay large sums of money to lease those grazing lands. Some American Indian tribe members are claiming the right to hunt on the land the government leases to farmers and ranchers in the state of Wyoming, even though it’s a clear violation of their tribal treaty with the United States.

Join the Fight

Since 1977, MSLF has fought to protect private property rights, individual liberties, and economic freedom. MSLF is a nonprofit public interest legal foundation. We represent clients pro bono and receive no government funding. Make your 100% tax deductible contribution today and join the fight.

Donate Now



United States Supreme Court

Case History

Farmers and ranchers are the backbone of this country and deserve to have a voice at the highest court in the nation.

This case, Hererra v. Wyoming, hinges on a long legal history involving Indian hunting rights. Specifically, the Crow Tribe treaty of 1868 reserved the right of tribe members to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States. 

Mountain States Legal Foundation filed an amicus brief, arguing that federally managed lands that are legally used by farmers and ranchers through agreements with the United States are inherently occupied and therefore not subject to the Crow Tribe’s treaty hunting right. 

MSLF’s argument is based on the plain meaning of the term “occupied” as understood today and in 1868, as well as the intent of both the tribe and the United States when signing and ratifying the treaty. 

“We are not seeking to overturn the hunting rights the Crow Tribe reserved in their treaty with the United States,” said MSLF attorney Cody Wisniewski. “Quite the contrary, we are just asking the Court to treat the right as the both the tribe and United States understood it in 1868.” 

Farmers and ranchers put leased federal lands to a beneficial use, and do so in partnership with the federal agencies that manage the lands. It is important that farmers and ranchers are able to protect their property interest in the lands they pay the United States to use, and that they do not have unknown parties hunting on those lands. 

MSLF filed the brief on behalf of the following associations: Wyoming Stock Growers Association, Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation, Wyoming Wool Growers Association, Montana Farm Bureau Federation, Idaho Farm Bureau Federation, Utah Farm Bureau Federation, Colorado Farm Bureau Federation, and South Dakota Cattlemen’s Association. 

Case Documents
Explore More

Hunting Guide’s Killing Raises Stakes in Grizzly Case

U.S. District Court Judge Dana Christensen issued a decision in late September invalidating the delisting of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear and returning the bear to the endangered species list—contrary to the recommendation of 20 years of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service research, and the pleas of Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and Mountain States Legal Foundation’s clients.

Wyoming Ranchers Ask Court To Uphold Original Purpose Of Endangered Species Act

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliud igitur esse censet gaudere, aliud non dolere. Res enim fortasse verae, certe graves, non ita tractantur, ut debent, sed aliquanto minutius. Mihi enim satis est, ipsis non satis. Deinde prima illa, quae in congressu solemus: Quid tu, inquit, huc? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Cur igitur, inquam,…

The Grizzly Wars

MSLF attorney Cody Wisniewski is quoted today in the Capital Press on the escalating battle between extreme environmental activists and Fish & Wildlife administrators. An environmental group has filed notice it will sue the Trump administration if it does not draft a comprehensive grizzly bear recovery plan encompassing much of the West… “It really is…

Get the latest updates from MSLF
News Updates