Case Summary

Issue:

Whether an Indian tribe has subject matter jurisdiction over civil litigation against a non-member arising from a slip-and-fall accident by a tribal member on non-Indian fee land located within the exterior boundaries of a reservation?

Plaintiff:

Sherman Motor Inn, Inc.

Defendant:

Douglas Garfield; Honorable Richard K. Jackson, Chief Judge, Fort Peck Tribal Court

Amicus Curiae:

Mountain States Legal Foundation

Join the Fight

Since 1977, MSLF has fought to protect private property rights, individual liberties, and economic freedom. MSLF is a nonprofit public interest legal foundation. We represent clients pro bono and receive no government funding. Make your 100% tax deductible contribution today and join the fight.

Donate Now

Status

Court

U.S. District Court for the District of Montana (No. 06cv102)

Case History

The Sherman Motor Inn, Inc., a non-Indian corporation organized under the laws of the State of Montana whose directors and shareholders are all non-Indians, operates a hotel/restaurant/lounge on non-Indian fee land in Wolf Point, Montana, within the exterior boundaries of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation.

Douglas Garfield is a citizen of the State of Montana and an enrolled member of the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes and resides within the exterior boundaries of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation. He alleges that, on January 12, 2000, he slipped and fell on a patch of ice and snow 15-20 feet from the front entrance to the Sherman Motor Inn. On May 31, 2000, Garfield filed a lawsuit in the Fort Peck Tribal Court seeking damages for the injuries he allegedly sustained in the slip and fall. The Sherman Motor Inn moved to dismiss the tribal court action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; however, on October 14, 2003, the Tribal Court held that the it had jurisdiction over the lawsuit. On September 25, 2006, the Fort Peck Tribal Court of Appeals upheld that ruling.

On November 7, 2006, the Sherman Motor Inn filed a complaint in Montana federal district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief preventing the Fort Peck Tribal Court from entertaining Garfield’s suit. On February 26, 2007, MSLF filed its friend of the court brief in support of the Sherman Motor Inn’s motion for summary judgment.

Explore More

We’re Headed to the Supreme Court in VanDerStok!

In a move that marks a significant turning point in the realm of firearms regulation, Mountain States Legal Foundation announces the Supreme Courtā€™s decision to hear VanDerStok v. Garland. Itā€™s…

Victory for George Sheetz

Victory for George, for property rights, for liberty, and for Americans! In a 9-0 unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the government cannot use the permitting process to twist…

SCOTUS WATCH: New Decision ALERT!

Today the Supreme Court of the United States issues an opinion in Students for Fair Admission, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College. MSLF’s General Counsel Will Trachman and…

Check-The-Box “Diversity” is At Odds with a Merit-Based Society

When did merit cease to serve as the primary basis for political or professional advancement in this supposedly colorblind, ā€œgender-neutral,ā€ equality-oriented society?  I of course recognize ā€œdiversityā€ (however one defines it) as a worthy goal, broadly speaking. But it amazes and troubles me…

Get the latest updates from MSLF
News Updates