Case Summary

Issue:

Whether the federal government may seize property and/or take governmental action that significantly damages property or impairs its use?

Plaintiff:

Arron Marston and Judy Marston

Defendant:

United States of America; United States Forest Service; Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Abigail R. Kimbell, Chief, United States Forest Service; Craig Bobzien, Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest; Lynn Kolund, District Ranger, Hell Canyon Ranger District, Black Hills National Forest

Join the Fight

Since 1977, MSLF has fought to protect private property rights, individual liberties, and economic freedom. MSLF is a nonprofit public interest legal foundation. We represent clients pro bono and receive no government funding. Make your 100% tax deductible contribution today and join the fight.

Donate Now

Status

Court

U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota, Western Division (No. 09cv5055)

Case History

Judy and Arron Marston own three unpatented mining claims in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota, called the D&R claims, which were located in the 1920s; Mrs. Marston inherited them in 2000.

On May 9, 2005, the U.S. Forest Service sent a letter to Mr. Marston soliciting comments regarding the Forest Service’s desire to install a gate on the mine’s adit to protect public safety and “sensitive” bat species allegedly hibernating in the mine. The following day, the Marstons contacted the Forest Service, and both parties agreed that a gate would not be installed.

On August 2, 2006, without advising the Marstons, the Forest Service bulldozed the shaft and trenches on the D&R claims. Then, on October 25, 2006, again without advising the Marstons, the Forest Service installed a locked gate on the adit.

In May of 2007, Mr. Marston discovered the actions taken and the damage done by the Forest Service. Notwithstanding demands by the Marstons, the Forest Service refused to pay for the damage it caused.

On July 30, 2008, the Marstons filed their claim as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act, as required by that Act prior to the filing of a lawsuit. On June 15, 2009, the Marstons filed a complaint in federal district court under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The federal defendants filed their answer to the complaint on August 31, 2009. On October 26, 2009, the court issued its scheduling order.

Explore More

MSLF announces first win in Rio Grande National Forest Case

Mountain States continues to rack up victories early in 2023 for our determined clients. In the latest good news, the San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council and other petitioners have agreed to dismiss several of their challenges to the revised forest plan for the Rio Grande National Forest. While several claims remain, this settlement represents a significant win for our clients: the Trails Preservation Alliance, the Colorado Snowmobile Association, and other forest riders.

Get the latest updates from MSLF
News Updates