Biographical Questions Forced Top ATC Candidates Out of FAA Hiring Pool

“The number of different high school sports I participated in.” 

“The age at which I first started to earn money (other than an allowance).” 

Strange questions to ask would-be air traffic controllers. Yet those questions and others were ones the Federal Aviation Administration asked potential air traffic controllers to answer as part of a new hiring system in 2013.  

The agency scrapped a skills-based test and instituted a biographical questionnaire which the FAA said was designed to attract more minorities. That change prevented top ATC candidates like Andrew Brigida from becoming ATCs.  

Andrew Brigida with MSLF General Counsel Zhonette Brown

Andrew graduated from Arizona State University’s Collegiate Training Initiative – a partnership program with the FAA which had previously been used to train and select the most qualified applicants. 

He even earned a top score of 100% on the Air Traffic Control Selection and Training examination and was briefly on the preferred hired list … until the federal agency changed the rules.  

When Andrew tried again to become an air traffic controller under the new rules he “failed” the biographical questionnaire. He didn’t fit the ethnic profile the FAA was seeking under the Obama administration. 

“Air traffic controllers play a critical role in safe air travel,” said MSLF general counsel, Zhonette Brown. “By introducing questions of ethnicity and cultural background, the FAA was playing politics with public safety.”  

On Nov. 1, 2019, attorneys for Mountain States Legal Foundation filed a motion in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., seeking class action status for more than 2,500 aspiring air traffic controllers who were harmed by the FAA’s racially discriminatory hiring policies. 

Two new class representatives, Matthew Douglas-Cook and Suzanne Rebich, have joined Andrew in the reenergized lawsuit, Brigida v U.S. Department of Transportation. Matthew and Suzanne also suffered a loss of opportunity under the new hiring program. Like Andrew, both were highly qualified CTI graduates who did not score high enough on the FAA’s biographical questionnaire to be considered for ATC positions. Instead, others who had less training and were less qualified were given hiring preference. 

With class action certification now under the court’s consideration, the impact of this case is poised to expand and reaffirm that all people should be treated equally under the law, regardless of their race. 

Stay up to date on Andrew’s case and other fights for freedom in the Mountain West. 

Join the Fight

Since 1977, MSLF has fought to protect private property rights, individual liberties, and economic freedom. MSLF is a nonprofit public interest legal foundation. We represent clients pro bono and receive no government funding. Make your 100% tax deductible contribution today and join the fight.

Donate Now

Explore More

Fight Escalates Over Race-Based Hiring Program at the FAA

The job of an air traffic controller is among the most challenging and important jobs in the nation. It requires intelligence, skill, and aptitude. The critical decisions made by air traffic controllers directly impact the safety of millions of air travelers. People who do this vital job hold people’s lives in their hands.

A Sobering Moment for the Second Amendment

Second Amendment supporters were shocked this month when the Supreme Court dismissed all 10 gunowners’ rights cases that were pending, thereby denying all 10 cases a hearing. Earlier this year, gun owners achieved a partial victory at the Supreme Court in a battle against New York City’s unconstitutional carry restrictions. MSLF submitted a brief in that…

The Supreme Court’s 2nd Amendment Misfire

On Monday, the Supreme Court declined to review all ten of the Second Amendment cases it had pending on its docket. Though the cases presented different fact patterns and procedural postures, the Court simply refused to weigh in on any of them. There seems to be one likely reason: Chief Justice Roberts does not want the Court to take a stance on the Second Amendment.

News Updates